Your Legal Fee Cap is Not a Saving
S ixty-seven percent of procurement officers are evaluated primarily on the immediate price reduction they secure during a contract negotiation. This single number, often tracked in a “cost-savings” column of a quarterly performance review, is perhaps the most dangerous metric in modern corporate governance. It creates a perverse incentive structure where the person responsible for buying expertise is rewarded for making that expertise as shallow as possible.
67%
Procurement officers measured by immediate price reduction rather than long-term value.
In a high-rise office in Singapore, overlooking a harbor choked with container ships, a procurement analyst named Daniel is currently winning. He has a spreadsheet open. On it, he has compared four different law firms in Colombo, Sri Lanka, for a significant share acquisition. He has broken them down by blended hourly rates, the seniority of the associates assigned, and a “value-adds” column that is currently a graveyard of buzzwords like “proactive communication” and “holistic approach.”
Daniel is not a lawyer. He has never been to Colombo. He does not know that the property being acquired sits on land where the title might be complicated by a century of overlapping colonial-era statutes and local deeds. What he knows is that Firm C is 15 percent more expensive than Firm B.
Daniel sends an email.
Your Legal Fee Cap is Not a Saving Read More »
